If it does well on Playstation, dont you think thats more incentive to make the sequel exclusive? That means those Playstation owners would have to buy the next xBox to play the game.
Exactly what I thought. Its just rehashes. Theyve taken so much out that used to be so good to have. Then they reintroduce (maybe) it as something new and awesome.
The franchise mode typically sucks, theres not so much any RPG elements to it. No articles about how good players are doing... Or how bad they are. Etc etc.
Customization of players is pretty atrocious.
Gameplay and graphics are rather subpar, fpr what they could be.
And here ladies and gentlemen.. we have an example of opinions.
One prefers the Xbox - One prefers the PS4.. shocker.
Then why would you even comment?
Not to mention, you say it looks pretty good - yet, you never heard of it.. and the link doesn't show anything. Trolling much?
ShockUltraslash - "Scalebound was due to Microsoft meddling with development trying to shove in multiplayer and ruining the developers vision. "
You have a source for that, orrr?
Then they would go out of business; because that IS there business.
Why is this even an issue? lol
I hate these mid-gen upgrades.. it's cool for the options, but seems like a huge slap in the face to early adopters. It'd be cool if they would actually give early adopters a credit for trade-in, at least.
I've yet to have any issue with my Switch; granted it's not that old (if that even matters?).. I've only had any kind of "drift" issues on one of my Xbox One controllers, but it's not bad either.
How so? I've seen a lot of cool things for a hefty 'discount.'
Id take a guess if it was true, it would be spin offs.. Like a phone game.
They might be in for a shock if the governments start to ban MT's and loot boxes.
No. No they don't.
The problem isn't the value that they may bring - the problem is how many you may need. Sure, $2.50 a month is not much.. but when you add in a subscription service for all the major publishers and developers, plus Sony Ninty and MS. Now you're looking at $100 a month to run all their subs.
Right now there is a choice - because there aren't that many out. But, when Sony has a service, EA has a service, Ubisoft has a service, Take Two has a service, Epic has a service..... where you can only buy their games thru that service for a monthly fee, it starts to become a problem, and a problem I don't want to be involved in.
Late reply, but whatever. I'll take that 1,000 word essay to my inbox, trot.
It's not nitpicking, your comment is just ridiculous. Your essentially attacking him for something asinine.
That's dumb. Just torrent it until they start to change their practices..
Eh. It's pretty cool of them to at least mention it. If they developed the game and didn't give any permissions to use content from the game - they should be able to say not to buy it, as they are releasing an 'actual' jacket from in-game.. i'd say.
I feel the only 'true' AC game was the first one.. none had the stealth factor down or as on point. The other games have been good, like the Ezio games, but it's come along ways away from the original concept.